Wednesday, August 27, 2003|
Innocents Caught in SCO-Linux Cross Fire. The battle between The SCO Group and the Linux and open-source communities is taking some innocent bystanders hostage. [eWEEK Technology News] Just call it collateral damage... 7:12:19 PM  comment []
|
|
Fact or FUD? Attorney offers views on SCO allegations (TechTarget). TechTarget - Whether or not the SCO Group wins its $3 billion lawsuit against IBM Corp., the company has succeeded in raising a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt about using Linux in an enterprise. But how do you know whether what you've heard about the case is a legitimate cause for concern or whether it's just FUD? Attorney, iLinx International LLC consultant and SearchEnterpriseLinux.com site expert Scott Nathan has been helping Linux administrators separate fact from FUD in the site's Ask the Expert section. In this article, he answers Linux administrators' questions, offering advice about how admins can protect their companies from SCO-induced legal liability. [Yahoo! News - Technology] 2:01:26 PM comment []
|
|
'Jane Doe' Lawyer Glenn Peterson Talks With Groklaw
Posted by
timothy
on Wednesday August 27, @07:33AM
from the sue-you-sue-anybody dept.
scubacuda writes "Glenn Peterson, attorney at McDonough Holland & Allen, represents 'Jane Doe,' one of the first to fight the constitutionality of recent RIAA subpoenas. In this GrepLaw interview,
Glenn gives his thoughts on recent RIAA strong arm tactics, Matt
Openheim's assertion that Jane Doe's arguments have 'already been
addressed by a federal judge,' and the danger of giving subpoena power
to anyone pretending to have a copyright claim." |
'Jane Doe' Lawyer Glenn Peterson Talks With GrepLaw
© Copyright
2003
Elmer Masters
.
Last update: 9/2/2003; 11:14:16 AM .
Last update: 9/2/2003; 11:14:16 AM .
